Some reasons not to support her were obvious right away:
* First, she's a Republican, which as far as I'm concerned pretty much makes her a man in drag.
* Second, she's anti-choice.
* Third, she put on, for the campaign, an exaggerated folksy accent which is entirely absent in her old broadcast footage. I can code-switch with the best of them, but when a candidate changes in this way to this extent, it says "I don't respect the American public" loud and clear.
And on further acquaintance, other reasons quickly manifested themselves:
* She's a total wingnut.
* She can read a teleprompter (which IS a skill) but cannot create sentences.
* Her campaign deliberately appealed to lowest common denominator fears.
And now -- will she go away? Will she become a broadcaster for Faux News? Will she be -- as hinted at by her product placement at the RepubGovs meeting today -- the new face of the GOP? Or will the Republicans be, rightly, embarrassed by her?
It's a bit like watching a train wreck; I desperately want never to see or hear her again, and yet I can't immediately dial or surf away from the stories about her. I cringe when I hear her tortured syntax, but ... schadenfreude lives.
A more serious discussion of the same topic by Andrew Sullivan, cited on Salon, today. At least I'm not alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment